Skip to content
Lenviq

One approval for the centre. An ordinary loan account for each member.

Microfinance and JLG software for NBFC-MFI and Section 8 lenders — centres, group loans and per-member accounts.

This is the loan origination and loan management software an NBFC-MFI or a Section 8 microfinance company runs a group book on: centres and groups, a joint liability group proposal that carries every member's amount, one four-eyes decision for the whole centre, and then N separate loan accounts — each with its own schedule, its own scheme snapshot and its own classification.

It is built for lenders regulated under the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Loans) Directions, 2022, and for Section 8 companies doing the same lending outside RBI registration. It is not a microfinance loan, and we are not a lender; this is the system the lender runs.

A group sanction awaiting approval: five members of one group, each asking for Rs 25,000, with the bureau score recorded against each name and no loan account yet.
One screen for the whole centre. The amount, the bureau enquiry and the signing date are decided once — and the Loan account column is empty until it is.

How a round runs, from centre meeting to disbursement

Group lending compresses the ACT and not the RECORD. Forty women borrowing ₹30,000 each is one decision to make and forty files to keep, and a system that collapses the second along with the first is one an inspection takes apart.

Centre and group
A centre carries its meeting day, its meeting time and the officer responsible. Groups sit under it, members under the group, and the leader is marked on the membership record rather than inferred.
The proposal
One proposal names every member and the amount each is asking for, against one scheme and one tenure. It is a draft until it is submitted, and a draft can be edited or discarded — the member list is REPLACED on edit, so a dropped member is really gone.
Preflight, before anybody is asked to approve
Every member is checked and every failure is named: KYC not verified, no bank account, an invalid IFSC, a live loan already running, no household income assessment on file, no bureau enquiry, no recorded consent, an amount outside the scheme range. The officer fixes the list before a checker ever sees it.
One four-eyes decision
The whole centre is approved or rejected once, with the date the group signed. The maker cannot be the checker.
Execution
The approved proposal becomes N loan applications and N sanctions. Anybody who fails at this point fails individually and is reported individually — the round does not fall over because one member's bank details changed.
Release
Disbursement is released for the group in one act, against a funded account. A lender whose books say the account is empty is refused before the money moves, not after.
Servicing and collection
Each member's loan services on its own schedule — weekly, fortnightly or monthly — and the demand sheet for a centre meeting is produced from those schedules.

What a group book has to do that no other book does

Four of these exist only in microfinance. The fifth is the one that decides whether the rest of the system can read the book at all.

The approval is once, and that is deliberate
Maker-checker applies to the group sanction, not to each member. Per-member approval would put forty files of ₹30,000 in front of a checker who stops reading by the fifth, and a control nobody exercises is not a control. One decision, on a list the officer has already had to clean.
Each member gets an ORDINARY loan account
Not a row inside a group record — a loan account with its own EMI schedule, its own scheme snapshot frozen at sanction, and its own classification. This is the claim worth proving rather than asserting: a second class of loan the LMS only half understands is how a book becomes unreportable. The group link lives on the microfinance side and adds no column to the loan.
A member cannot be originated without the household income assessment
Paragraph 4.1 of the 2022 Directions requires a board-approved policy for assessing household income, and the figure is not optional detail. Preflight refuses a member with no income recorded, and an income cannot be recorded without an occupation behind it.
The bureau enquiry and its consent are both required, per member
An indebtedness check with no recorded consent is not a lawful enquiry. Both the enquiry and the consent are preflight conditions, so a round cannot be executed on a member for whom either is missing.
Failure is per member, not per round
One member's invalid IFSC does not stop thirty-nine disbursements. Execution reports who originated and who failed, with the reason, and the proposal moves to awaiting release carrying both.
The same group after execution, marked disbursed: five members, Rs 30,000 each, and an open loan account against every name.
After one approval: five separate loan accounts, each open in its own right. The group compressed the decision, not the record.

The 2022 Directions, and which parts land in software

Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Loans) Directions, 2022 — RBI/DOR/2021-22/89, DoR.FIN.REC.95/03.10.038/2021-22, dated 14 March 2022, effective 1 April 2022, updated as on 17 July 2025. These are the provisions that stop being policy and start being records.

The definition itself (para 3.1)
A microfinance loan is a collateral-free loan to a household with annual household income up to ₹3,00,000. Both limbs are part of the definition, so the income figure decides whether the Directions apply at all — not merely how much may be lent.
Collateral-free, and no lien (paras 3.1, 3.3)
The loan is collateral-free, and para 3.3 adds that it shall not be linked with a lien on the borrower's deposit account.
The household income assessment (paras 4.1, 4.3)
A board-approved policy is required for assessing household income, and household income must be reported to the credit information companies. Annex I describes capturing household profile, income sources and expenses, with self-reported income corroborated.
The repayment cap (paras 5.1, 5.2)
Repayment obligations are limited to a maximum of 50 per cent of monthly household income, and the cap covers repayments on all existing loans plus the one under consideration. SEE THE NOTE BELOW — the software does not compute this.
Pricing and its disclosure (paras 6.1, 6.2, 6.7)
A board-approved pricing policy with an interest rate model and a ceiling; rates that are not usurious; and prominent display of the minimum, maximum and average rates charged on microfinance loans.
The Key Facts Statement (paras 6A.2, 6A.4)
A KFS to every prospective borrower, including an APR computation sheet and an amortisation schedule. Annex II gives the illustrative factsheet.
What the software does NOT do, stated plainly
It does not compute or enforce the 50% repayment cap. It requires the household income assessment to exist before a member can be originated, and refuses the member if it does not — which is a different and smaller thing. A lender applying the cap is applying its own board-approved policy, not a calculation this system performs.

Every position above is implemented against a named direction. The compliance page sets out each one with the instrument it comes from and its date.

What the round produces on paper

A group round generates per-member paper and centre-level paper, and the two are not interchangeable when somebody asks for a file.

A sanction per member
Each member's sanction is its own record with its own terms, because each is its own loan.
A Key Facts Statement per member
Required by para 6A.2 for every prospective borrower, with the APR sheet and the amortisation schedule the paragraph calls for.
The demand sheet for the meeting
What each member owes at the next centre meeting, produced from the schedules rather than typed.
The signing date is recorded where it is typed
A group's acceptance date is checked against the sanction it accepts — a date before the sanction was drawn up, or one in the future, is refused.

Reading a group book

Because each member is an ordinary loan account, a group book reports through the same engine as everything else rather than through a parallel one.

One DPD engine
Days past due are computed for a group member's loan by the same engine that serves every other product, from the same due events. A separate path for group loans is how a book ends up with two answers to whether a borrower is in arrears.
Classification follows the same rules
IRACP's ninety-days-past-due basis, computed in the day-end process for the relevant date.
Collections from the field
A collector's round is a list of accounts, and the day-end reconciles what was collected against what was carried.

Each names the one question it answers and the date it is as at. The full reporting catalogue lists what is available across the book.

Questions

What lenders ask about this book

Does the software enforce the 50% of household income cap?
No. It requires the household income assessment to be on file and refuses to originate a member without it, but it does not compute the cap or test a member's obligations against it. Applying the cap is the lender's board-approved policy under paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 of the 2022 Directions. We would rather say this than let the page imply otherwise.
Is a group loan one account or one account per member?
One per member. Each is an ordinary loan account with its own EMI schedule, its own scheme snapshot and its own classification; the group link lives on the microfinance side and adds nothing to the loan record. What the group compresses is the decision, not the record.
How many approvals does a round of forty loans need?
One. Maker-checker applies to the group sanction rather than to each member, because a checker asked to approve forty files of ₹30,000 stops reading by the fifth. The preflight is what makes one approval safe: every member is checked and every failure named before the checker sees the list.
What happens if one member fails at disbursement?
That member fails and the rest proceed. Execution and release both report who succeeded and who did not, with the reason, so a changed bank account does not hold up thirty-nine disbursements.
Does it work for a Section 8 company as well as an NBFC-MFI?
Both are provisioned regimes. The difference the system itself records is that a Section 8 microfinance company is exempt from RBI registration and therefore files no RBI returns, so the returns module does not apply to it.

Related

Read further

See it against your own book.

A demonstration runs on your product mix rather than a script — bring the case you think is hardest.